Risk Management

From financial service firms to manufacturers to scientists, uncertainty in quantitative and qualitative analysis is a major concern. Lumivero's tools enable you to model risks by analyzing all possible outcomes and help you confidently make informed decisions to optimize growth opportunities by showing which risks are worth taking and which to avoid.

According to the Society for Risk Analysis, risk analysis is defined as “a distinct science covering risk assessment, perception, communication, management, governance and policy.” Investopedia narrows this somewhat, describing risk analysis as “the process of assessing the likelihood of an adverse event occurring within the corporate, government, or environmental sector. Risk analysis is the study of the underlying uncertainty of a given course of action.” Risk analysis is practiced in science, industry, academia, and in government. It is critical for business, engineering, healthcare, legal, policy, and countless other disciplines.

However you look at it, the analysis of risk seeks to identify, understand, and mitigate adverse or hazardous events. We would argue that, as the Society for Risk Analysis points out, this concept extends beyond just naming specific risks and figuring out how to control them; rather, risk analysis needs to encompass the way risk is thought about, discussed, and communicated within and between organizations. Too often, risk management (of which risk analysis is typically considered a subset) is relegated to distinct silos within an organization, a check-the-box function whose purpose is to meet regulatory and shareholder requirements. However, the data is clear that successful organizations incorporate risk management throughout, making it a consideration with every conversation. This enterprise approach – Enterprise Risk Management – breaks down communication barriers and tackles biases, instituting new ways of thinking based more on objective fact, data, or experience and less on subjective opinion.

All ProductsThis is not to say that personal judgment has no role to play in good risk management. Indeed, there are two primary categories of risk analysis: qualitative (relying on judgment) and quantitative (relying on numbers). Each adds value to the process, and each involves the same fundamental steps:

- Identify what could go wrong;
- Assign some probability or likelihood of the risk occurring; and
- Estimate the impact the event will have if it happens.

Quantitative risk analysis leverages quantitative estimates, Monte Carlo simulation, and, sometimes, data to numerically measure risk. Unlike qualitative risk analysis, quantitative approaches allow for the inclusion of random variables, thus more accurately reflecting real life situations. Furthermore, quantitative models enable you to perform sensitivity and scenario analysis in order to determine which individual factors or combinations of factors (scenarios) drive risk the most. This is a powerful diagnostic tool for determining how to mitigate or reduce risks; if you don’t know what is causing risk, you can’t begin to treat it.

There are two types of quantitative risk analysis: deterministic and stochastic.

Deterministic risk analysis relies on single-point estimates for unknown or uncertain variables and does not allow for any variability or randomness. Using this method, an analyst may assign values to discrete scenarios to see what outcome may result from each. It is very common to examine three arbitrary potential outcomes: worst case, best case, and most likely case, typically defined something like this:

There are several problems with the deterministic risk analysis approach:

It considers only a few discrete outcomes, which are often subjectively defined without regard for how realistic they may be, while ignoring thousands of others.

It gives equal weight to each outcome. That is, no attempt is made to assess the likelihood of each outcome.

Interdependence between inputs, the impact of different inputs relative to the outcome, and other nuances are ignored, oversimplifying the model and reducing its accuracy.

Stochastic risk analysis, by contrast, accounts for uncertainty and randomness in risk models. It is performed using Monte Carlo simulation, an approach that represents unknown input variables with ranges of values, or statistical distribution functions. This allows you automatically calculate your risk model thousands of times, using a different set of input values each time. The result is a much more realistic picture of the many possible outcomes that exist, plus significant time savings for the user.

Earlier we mentioned that qualitative risk analysis has a role to play in making good decisions involving risk. The definition of unknown input variables for a Monte Carlo simulation is a perfect example of this. Expert opinion is very important in the construction of any risk model, particularly in the absence of data. A further example is the interpretation of the results from a Monte Carlo simulation. It takes context and judgment to follow the insights a simulation can produce, and to leverage those results into effective mitigation and go-forward strategies.

The outcomes can be graphed in many different ways to visually communicate information such as the probabilities of achieving targets and the variance in the results, such as the histogram shown below.

It’s possible to understand the spread of possible outcomes and determine the sensitivity of the results to different inputs. The tornado diagram below is an example of this.

Relationships between unknown variables can be modeled using correlations to accurately reflect interdependencies in the results.

The results of a Monte Carlo simulation as shown in histogram form.

A tornado graph showing the most important factors, ranked, from a Monte Carlo simulation.

Despite the intensity of its calculations, Monte Carlo simulation is a highly accessible and intuitive technique that is available at the desktop level within Microsoft Excel.

Lumivero offers tools that compute and track possible future scenarios using Monte Carlo simulations. These are computerized, mathematical techniques to calculate the likelihood of any given scenario occurring, thus empowering you to account for risk in your decision-making. Look into every possible outcome, understand its probability, and confidently make decisions based on the easy-to-read reports.

Read moreCorporate leadership is ready to launch a new venture, but much is still unknown. What is the probability the new venture will make money or take a loss, and why? Is the planned budget sufficient, or will the company need a contingency? You could go around the room and get everyone’s opinions, or you can see for yourself with Lumivero’s tools. By running simulations based on known data or expert opinion, you can see the probability of each potential outcome and choose strategies with confidence.

All ProductsLeaders consider many factors when making decisions, but not every factor has the same impact. Using sensitivity analysis with Lumivero’s tools, decision-makers can see which inputs have the most significant impact on outcomes, so they can prioritize the strategies that get the critical factors right.

read moreRunning Monte Carlo simulations with a Lumivero tool doesn’t require you to implement and learn an entirely new software platform. It’s an Excel add-on, so you can run all these calculations and gain the insight you need while using a familiar foundational platform.

All ProductsThe data is clear – successful organizations incorporate risk management throughout their strategy, making it a consideration with every conversation. If you don’t know what is causing the risk, you can’t begin to mitigate it. Get started with Lumivero’s quantitative analysis software today.