By Abigail Jacobsen, Senior Content Marketing Manager, Lumivero

Thematic analysis follows six phases—familiarization, coding, generating themes, reviewing themes, refining and naming themes, and writing the report. This article briefly covers each phase, then highlights where NVivo AI Cloud's tools—memos, the hierarchical codebook, and automatically generated matrices—fit in, along with where AURA can speed up tasks like summarizing documents, suggesting codes, and answering grounded questions about your data. Final analytical decisions always stay with the researcher.

This article dives into how to run thematic analysis using NVivo AI Cloud, powerful qualitative data analysis software. You'll find a quick refresher on the six phases below, followed by where NVivo AI Cloud tools—memos, the hierarchical codebook, and automatically generated matrices—fit in, along with where AURA can speed up tasks like summarizing documents, suggesting codes, and answering grounded questions about your data, so you can move from raw transcripts to well-documented themes without cutting corners on rigor.
Thematic analysis is a method for identifying, analyzing, and interpreting meaningful patterns — or themes — within qualitative data. Most commonly associated with Braun and Clarke, it follows a six-phase process that can be applied inductively (where themes emerge from the data) or deductively (where analysis is guided by existing theory), and works with interview transcripts, focus group discussions, open-ended survey responses, and written documents. Want the full picture, including how thematic analysis compares to discourse analysis, content analysis, grounded theory, and framework analysis? Read our complete guide to thematic analysis.
The six phases are:
These phases can be done manually, but qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) like NVivo makes each one faster and easier to document.
NVivo AI Cloud won't do the thinking for you, but it gives you structured tools for organizing, coding, and documenting your process at every phase:
If you're weighing NVivo's task-based AI Assistant against general-purpose options, our guide to the best AI tools for academic research breaks down 21 tools across discovery, writing, and analysis.
Discover key findings on how researchers are adopting, trusting, and governing AI in their qualitative and mixed methods work.
Download report →AURA, NVivo AI Cloud's AI-powered Unified Research Assistant, helps out at several points along the way. It shows up most during familiarization, coding, and theme refinement:
A few things worth knowing: every AI-suggested code, topic, and summary can be reviewed, confirmed, or rejected before it becomes part of your project, and a full, exportable audit trail—with AI-prompt inspection and AI/human attribution—records exactly who, or what, made each analytic decision.
If you're ready to take your qualitative research to the next level, NVivo AI Cloud is your go-to tool for powerful, efficient thematic analysis. It helps you organize, code, and interpret large volumes of unstructured data—so you can move from raw transcripts to meaningful patterns with clarity and confidence.
NVivo AI Cloud, NVivo Desktop, and ATLAS.ti are all part of Lumivero's portfolio and rank among the most trusted platforms for thematic analysis, though they suit slightly different workflows. NVivo AI Cloud pairs agentic AI workflows—topic identification with evidence, auto-coding, a full audit trail—with the methodology researchers already trust from NVivo, making it a strong fit for projects that need to hold up to committee or peer review from the outset. NVivo Desktop is built for structured, systematic analysis—cases, queries, and Framework Matrices make it a strong fit for larger or more formal projects—while ATLAS.ti favors flexible, exploratory analysis with network visualization for mapping ideas as they emerge. All let you code data, organize it into themes, and interpret findings efficiently.
AURA combines discrete actions—summarizing a document, identifying topics with evidence, suggesting child codes—with AURA Chat, a grounded conversational assistant you can ask questions of directly. Every suggestion can be reviewed, confirmed, or rejected, and a full audit trail records every AI and human decision.
Yes—and NVivo AI Cloud has a feature built specifically for this: Analyse with AURA reads a focus group transcript and automatically creates a case for each speaker, correctly excluding the moderator from the analysis so their turns don't skew results. That gives you data organized by participant from the start, ready to compare shared views, disagreements, and patterns.
How can we help you? Contact us.