By Abigail Jacobsen, Senior Content Marketing Manager, Lumivero

Thematic analysis follows six phases—familiarization, coding, generating themes, reviewing themes, refining and naming themes, and writing the report. This article briefly covers each phase, then highlights where NVivo tools like memos, code hierarchies, and Framework Matrices fit in, along with where the Lumivero AI Assistant can speed up tasks like summarizing documents, suggesting child codes, and drafting Framework Matrix summaries. Final analytical decisions always stay with the researcher.
This article dives into how to run thematic analysis using NVivo, powerful qualitative data analysis software. You'll find a quick refresher on the six phases below, followed by where NVivo tools—memos, code hierarchies, coding stripes, Framework Matrices—and the AI Assistant add-on fit into each one, so you can move from raw transcripts to well-documented themes without cutting corners on rigor.
Supercharge your qualitative research with NVivo!
Thematic analysis is a method for identifying, analyzing, and interpreting meaningful patterns — or themes — within qualitative data. Most commonly associated with Braun and Clarke, it follows a six-phase process that can be applied inductively (where themes emerge from the data) or deductively (where analysis is guided by existing theory), and works with interview transcripts, focus group discussions, open-ended survey responses, and written documents. Want the full picture, including how thematic analysis compares to discourse analysis, content analysis, grounded theory, and framework analysis? Read our complete guide to thematic analysis.
The six phases are:
These phases can be done manually, but qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) like NVivo makes each one faster and easier to document.
NVivo won't do the thinking for you, but it gives you structured tools for organizing, coding, and documenting your process at every phase:
The NVivo AI Assistant is task-based—you select a specific action for it to perform, rather than working through open-ended chat—and it's designed to reduce repetitive work while you stay in control of interpretation. It shows up most during familiarization, coding, and theme refinement:
A few things worth knowing: summaries are generated one document at a time rather than as a single combined summary across multiple documents, and all AI-suggested codes and summaries can be reviewed, edited, or rejected. Organizations can also switch AI features on or off at the admin or local level—helpful for teams working under strict IRB, ethical, or data-privacy requirements.
If you're ready to take your qualitative research to the next level, NVivo is your go-to tool for powerful, efficient thematic analysis. It helps you organize, code, and interpret large volumes of unstructured data—so you can move from raw transcripts to meaningful patterns with clarity and confidence.
NVivo and ATLAS.ti are both part of Lumivero's portfolio and rank among the most trusted platforms for thematic analysis, though they suit slightly different workflows. NVivo is built for structured, systematic analysis—cases, queries, and Framework Matrices make it a strong fit for larger or more formal projects—while ATLAS.ti favors flexible, exploratory analysis with network visualization for mapping ideas as they emerge. Both let you code data, organize it into themes, and interpret findings efficiently, and both include AI features to speed up early-stage analysis: NVivo's AI Assistant is task-based (summarization, code suggestions, sentiment analysis), while ATLAS.ti's AI supports more conversational, prompt-based interaction.
It's a task-based tool, not a chatbot: you can ask it to summarize a document or passage, suggest child codes based on your existing coding, run sentiment analysis, or draft a summary within a Framework Matrix cell. Every suggestion can be reviewed, edited, or rejected, and it can be switched off entirely for teams with strict data-governance requirements.
Yes. NVivo lets you code and compare data across participants and cases, making it well suited to identifying shared views, disagreements, and patterns within focus groups.
How can we help you? Contact us.