Key takeaways
CACREP accreditation signals that a counseling program meets rigorous, peer-reviewed standards for curriculum, faculty, and clinical training. New CACREP accreditation standards were adopted in July 2024, and all previously accredited programs had to be following the new standards as of June 30, 2024. The new CACREP process requires a more data-intensive approach, which makes centralized, regular capture of fieldwork logs and outcomes data key to avoiding a painful accreditation cycle.
Obtaining and maintaining programmatic accreditation from the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs (CACREP) for your counseling program is challenging, but for many programs, it’s worth it. Accreditation can enhance your program’s competitive advantage and establish a foundation for long-term credibility. Adhering to a set of peer-reviewed, shared standards benefits your institution, your students, their future clients, and the counseling profession as a whole.
With CACREP’s 2024 Standards in effect as of June 30, 2026, the accreditation and reaccreditation processes look a little different than they did a few years ago—and the requirements are only becoming more data-intensive.
This guide walks counselor education program administrators through what CACREP accreditation is, which states require it, how the initial accreditation and reaccreditation cycles work today, costs, and how to make the data and reporting burdens easier to manage with Experiential Learning Cloud.
What is CACREP accreditation?
CACREP accredits master’s and doctoral degrees in counseling. Like other specialized accreditors, CACREP aims to verify that a program meets pre-determined standards for its curriculum, faculty qualifications, and clinical training. CACREP is recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), which is what gives CACREP approval weight with state licensing boards, other accrediting bodies, and employers.
Obtaining CACREP accreditation for your counseling program is not merely a boost for recruitment. It also signals to students that the credential they earn will support licensure eligibility and their job search after graduation.
Institutional vs. specialized (programmatic) accreditation
There’s more than one type of accreditation. Institutional accreditation evaluates an entire college or university. Specialized or programmatic accreditation, such as that granted by CACREP, looks only at individual programs. Specialized accreditors typically cover professional preparation programs, such as nursing, teaching, allied health (e.g., physical and occupational therapy), and accounting.
Note that institutional accreditation is often a requirement for obtaining specialized accreditation—CACREP specifies this on its website. Also note that a university can be institutionally accredited while its counseling programs are not. This matters to students who want to train to become counselors, and to state licensing bodies and employers.
Types of counseling programs accredited by CACREP
CACREP accredits master’s and doctoral programs in eight specialized areas of practice, including:
- Addiction counseling
- Career counseling
- Clinical mental health counseling
- Clinical rehabilitation counseling
- College counseling and student affairs
- Marriage, couple, and family counseling
- Rehabilitation counseling
- School counseling
One of the first steps toward obtaining CACREP accreditation is aligning the counseling programs you offer with one of the areas of practice above.
How important is CACREP accreditation?
CACREP accreditation is important because it has implications for program recruitment, graduate licensing eligibility, and employment outcomes. Here are some more details about why accreditation matters.
Required for licensure in some states
A growing number of states require graduates to have earned their counseling degree from a CACREP-accredited program before they can become eligible for licensure. (See below for more specifics.)
Assuring students that their education has value
Prospective students may be more likely to commit to programs that are approved by trusted independent organizations. Having a CACREP seal on your program’s webpage—and showing up in CACREP’s database of accredited institutions—signals to students that a degree they earn with you will meet profession-wide standards for quality and rigor in curriculum, faculty supervision, and clinical practicum experiences.
Ensuring ongoing program relevance
Maintaining CACREP accreditation requires programs to keep up with best practices in counselor education as well as professional counseling theory and methods. A CACREP-accredited program signals to students that they will learn the concepts and skills they need to excel in their field.
Preparing students for the workplace
CACREP’s practicum and internship standards were made to meet industry needs. Employers, particularly clinical practices and large health systems, often prefer or require candidates who are graduates of accredited programs. So do some federal employers: for example, the U.S. Department of Defense requires that TRICARE-certified mental health counselors hold a degree from a CACREP-accredited program.
States that require CACREP accreditation
Licensure requirements for counselors vary by state. As of 2026, four states require graduates to hold a CACREP-accredited degree to become eligible for licensure as a professional counselor. These are:
- Florida
- Kentucky
- North Carolina
- Ohio
Of these, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Ohio apply the requirement without exception. Florida’s rule came into effect in 2025, so its licensure process still allows for some case-by-case review of student credentials.
However, CACREP standards may be used as a benchmark even in states that don’t require programmatic accreditation to become eligible for a license. According to CACREP, 27 states “specifically cite CACREP in their rules or regulations as meeting the educational requirements for licensure.” 15 of the remaining 23 states have policies which align with CACREP’s core requirements, even if they don’t mention CACREP specifically.
States change policies regularly, so schools should confirm licensure requirements directly with state boards to ensure their program meets current standards.
How programs earn CACREP accreditation
Programs must be able to demonstrate that they meet CACREP standards to obtain accreditation.
CACREP’s 2024 Standards cover six areas:
- The learning environment
- Academic quality
- Foundational curriculum
- Professional practice
- Entry-level specialized practice areas
- Doctoral standards for counselor education and supervision
We cover these standards in more detail below. When applying the standards in practice, counseling program administrators will need to be able to show that they have developed degrees which can:
Maintain an approved learning environment
CACREP evaluates faculty preparation, institutional support, resources, and program structure, not just the curriculum or field experience opportunities.
Use an approved curriculum
Your program must align its coursework with CACREP’s defined core areas and any standards it sets for specialty practice areas.
Offer practicum and internship opportunities
Programs must provide students with access to supervised field experience that prepares them for licensure and employment. These can be led by faculty members or coordinated with external sites.
Carry out regular internal review and evaluation
CACREP builds self-evaluation into its standards to help programs surface issues with gaps in their curriculum or student outcomes before they become problems for accreditors.
Meet a specified student-faculty ratio
Programs need to hire enough faculty to provide adequate advising, supervision, and mentorship for students. CACREP checks your program’s student-faculty ratio during reviews.
Provide appropriate resources
Students need access to research materials, technology, and internship opportunities. Your program will need to show how and where those resources are made available.
An overview of CACREP’s 2024 accreditation standards
As mentioned above, CACREP’s standards are broken out into six areas. These standards were adopted in July of 2024, and all previously accredited programs must comply with them as of June 2026. Here is a brief look at what each of the six sections covers.
Section 1: The learning environment
Section 1 describes standards that relate to the institution, the academic program, and how program faculty and staff are qualified and trained.
Section 2: Academic quality
This section covers standards related to program evaluation and student assessment for all entry-level and doctoral programs.
Section 3: Foundational counseling curriculum
This section outlines the eight core curriculum areas that apply to all entry-level counseling degree programs.
Section 4: Professional practice
Section 4 covers requirements for entry-level counseling students’ clinical training, including practicum, internship, and supervision standards.
Section 5: Entry-level specialty areas of practice
This section goes into more detail about curriculum and clinical practice standards for the eight specialty practice areas mentioned earlier in this guide.
Section 6: Doctoral standards for counselor education and supervision training programs
This section outlines learning environment and internship requirements that apply specifically to doctoral programs that teach experienced counselors to train new ones.
Steps in the CACREP accreditation cycle (and 2026 fees)
Earning accreditation is not a single event. Instead, it’s a multi-stage process. Completing initial accreditation can take 12 to 18 months, and maintaining accreditation requires years of ongoing compliance documentation and reporting. Here’s how the process typically unfolds—and the typical fees, as outlined by CACREP:
Step 1: Continuous data collection and self-assessment
Programs track student fieldwork logs, core learning outcomes, and evaluation data on a continuous basis. This documentation forms the foundation of the program’s self-study report, a required step in accreditation or re-accreditation.
Step 2: Submitting a formal self-study report to CACREP
After compiling documentation into a self-study report using one of CACREP’s approved report templates, programs then submit their application to CACREP’s Accreditation Management System (AMS). This is a centralized platform for reviewing submissions. First-time applicants must pay an AMS access fee. This fee is credited toward the separate application fee.
Step 3: Initial review and requests for further information
CACREP evaluators assess your self-study report against their standards. After review, they may request additional documentation or clarification before scheduling a site visit.
Step 4: The on-site visit
A trained team of three CACREP evaluators visits your site to verify that your self-study report accurately represents what is happening at your school. They will interview faculty and staff and review your facilities and resources. The site visit requires a fee.
Step 5: CACREP board review and decision
The CACREP Board of Directors meets to review programs’ self-study and site reports, as well as any program responses to site visit findings or other requests. Within 30 days of the meeting, the board issues a written decision about accreditation to the program. Some programs will not be accredited. Others will be awarded full accreditation, which lasts eight years. Others will be “accredited with conditions”—that is, they must address specified issues and be reviewed again in two years, rather than eight.
Programs can appeal board decisions, for a fee.
Step 6: Ongoing compliance and reporting
Programs must submit regular reports to CACREP during the eight-year accreditation period and apply for reaccreditation, which requires a fee.
CACREP fees as of 2026
CACREP requires fees at different stages of the accreditation process. We’ve noted them above, but this table sets them out for reference.
|
Fee |
Cost |
|---|---|
|
Initial AMS access fee |
$1,000 (first-time applicants only) |
|
Application/ self-study fee |
$3,750 |
|
Site visit fee |
$6,000 (for a three-person team; larger teams may cost more) |
|
Annual maintenance fee |
$4,275 |
|
Board decision appeal fee |
$1,500 |
|
Appeal panel hearing fee |
$5,000 (hearings are not always required) |
Fees are determined by CACREP and subject to change. The chart above lists fees as of Oct. 7, 2026. Check the CACREP website for the most up-to-date information.
Common CACREP reaccreditation challenges
Reaccreditation is demanding. It requires aligning and organizing many different people and processes. Students, faculty, field supervisors, and administrators must all contribute to tracking those processes by reporting on field activities, scores, evaluations, and more. Evolving standards can introduce new challenges, as can staff turnover during accreditation cycles.
Programs that fail to integrate continuous data collection practices—particularly those with large numbers of students—will find the reaccreditation process significantly more painful.
Common challenges during CACREP reaccreditation include:
- Decentralized student logs and fieldwork tracking. When practicum and internship hours live across dispersed spreadsheets, shared drives, and individual supervisors' records, it's easy for hours to go missing or for data to be inconsistent by the time a report is due.
- Administrative burnout. Scrambling once every eight years to assemble more than a hundred pages of self-study documentation from scratch puts enormous pressure on a small number of administrators. This is particularly true when they have to keep up with their regular responsibilities alongside reaccreditation preparation.
- Maintaining continuous readiness. The healthiest programs shift from “periodic panic”—a frantic push before each deadline—to real-time compliance tracking, where the data needed for the next report is always current, not reconstructed after the fact.The healthiest programs shift from “periodic panic” — a frantic push before each deadline — to real-time compliance tracking, where the data needed for the next report is always current, not reconstructed after the fact.
How Experiential Learning Cloud makes CACREP accreditation reporting easier
Experiential Learning Cloud offers schools a single convenient collection point for the data that informs the CACREP accreditation process. Experiential Learning Cloud’s field experience tools cover data for professional practice (section 4 of CACREP’s 2024 standards), while its program outcomes tools provide academic quality evidence (section 2). It can also be configured to help programs evaluate student performance in alignment with sections 1, 5, and 6 of the CACREP standards.
Experiential Learning Cloud does more than just store data: it also makes it possible to generate reports immediately.
|
Report type |
What it shows |
|---|---|
|
Individual student rubric |
Analysis An individual student's performance and progress on a given rubric over time, including key assignments |
|
Group rubric analysis |
Aggregate performance across a group of students on a given rubric—distribution, mean, mode, and standard deviation |
|
Individual student accreditation standards |
One student's outcomes aggregated across every assessment measure aligned to your program's accreditation standards |
|
Group analysis of accreditation standards |
The number and percentage of students meeting the minimum acceptable score across all aligned assessment measures |
|
Accreditation standards raw data |
A full spreadsheet export of every score recorded against your program's assessment standards |
With just a few clicks, administrators can produce CACREP-ready reports on student or program outcomes that can be filtered by date range, cohort, specialization, or assessor role for more targeted insights.
Streamline your CACREP accreditation preparation
Whether you’re pursuing initial CACREP accreditation or preparing for reaccreditation, Experiential Learning Cloud equips your team with tools to streamline field experience data tracking and reporting. You can build your self-study report with data you already have—not data you spend weeks hunting for and compiling.
Request a demo today to see how Experiential Learning Cloud can support your counseling program's CACREP accreditation process.
Rose Judson
Technology Copywriter, higher education, statistical, and risk management specialist
Rose Judson is an independent communications consultant based in the UK. For more than 15 years, she has written for higher education, technology, and healthcare organizations. She has been writing about data analysis, risk management, and college field experience topics since 2023.
Frequently asked questions
CACREP (the Council for Accreditation of Counseling and Related Educational Programs) is a specialized accrediting body recognized by the Council on Higher Education Accreditation. It accredits master's and doctoral programs in counseling based on an evaluation of how well each program meets its standards for curriculum, faculty, and clinical training.
Yes. It strengthens a program's reputation, is increasingly tied to state licensure, and factors into some federal hiring requirements.
As of 2026, Florida, Kentucky, North Carolina, and Ohio require a CACREP-accredited degree for counselor licensure. Many other states cite CACREP accreditation standards in their licensure policies, or use its curriculum as a benchmark, without formally requiring it.
CACREP estimates 12 to 18 months from application to a final decision, covering self-study preparation, initial review, the site visit, and the board's decision.
A two-year accreditation with conditions means the program didn't fully meet every standard on its first review. It must address the identified deficiencies and undergo an additional review within that two-year window rather than waiting for the full eight-year cycle.
Beyond the initial review, accredited programs must submit ongoing annual reports and maintain continuous compliance with current standards—including transitioning to any newly released standards within CACREP's required window.
CACREP evaluates programs through a combination of self-study documentation, site visits, and Board review, checking evidence against each of the six sections of its current standards. The most recent standards were adopted in July 2024 and came into effect for all currently accredited programs on June 30, 2026.


